War
Could Give Airlines Room for Layoffs
Wednesday
March 19, 4:38 pm ET
By
Brad Foss, AP Business Writer
War
Could Give Airlines Legal Wiggle Room to Lay Off More Employees
NEW
YORK (AP) -- While a war in Iraq will most likely weaken demand for air travel,
it could also provide struggling carriers with legal cover to reduce bloated
costs by laying off significant numbers of employees without violating existing
labor contracts
As
they did shortly after the terrorist attacks of 2001, major carriers could
invoke "force majeure" clauses in labor contracts, freeing them from
union-negotiated agreements related to seniority and work rules -- stipulations
that can make it difficult to cut jobs.
Force
majeure is the legal term for uncontrollable events that release parties from
their contractual obligations.
"It's
something they would have to look at if they see their losses multiplying as a
result of war," Jim Corridore, an airline analyst at Standard & Poor's
in New York, said Wednesday.
Analysts
blame the airline industry's whopping losses over the past two years on
excessive labor expenses, poor economic conditions and the decrease in spending
by business travelers.
Corridore
said industrywide capacity needs to be reduced significantly to better reflect
today's diminished demand. And with fewer planes, the airlines would need fewer
employees, Corridore said.
"Force
majeure would allow them to impose furloughs on employees without going up
against labor agreements," he said.
Of
course, unions would likely respond to any force majeure invocations by suing
the airlines -- just as they did after the Sept. 11 attacks -- claiming that the
industry's woes are really tied to the weak economy.
"We'll
probably wind up in court to fight it," said O.V. Delle-Femine, national
director of the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association, which represents
13,400 workers at Northwest Airlines. In fact, a lawsuit the union filed on
behalf of 600 workers fired after Sept. 11 is still pending, Delle-Femine said.
Last
month, Delta Air Lines was forced by an arbitrator to cancel the planned
furlough of 20 pilots because of a lawsuit filed by the Air Line Pilots
Association. Earlier battles against the Atlanta-based carrier's use of force
majeure were unsuccessful, though.
Ray
Neidl, an analyst at Blaylock & Partners, said there's evidence that
passenger traffic has already dropped off in anticipation of war and that this
could weaken carriers' claims that a decrease in business was unforeseen.
It
really depends on the length and severity of the military conflict, Neidl said.
The
chief executive of Northwest Airlines, Richard Anderson, said earlier this week
that war would necessitate "further cost reductions" at the Eagan,
Minn.-based carrier.
That
could signal Anderson's intention to declare force majeure, said Peter Capelli,
professor of management at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of
Business. "Once one of them does it, they all will," Cappelli said.