AFA - CWA US Airways MEC E-Line - "Staying Informed"

The AFA Newsletter for US Airways Flight Attendants

    In this Issue

 

Sept. 26, 2008

Dear Members,
  • WHAT IS "ILLEGAL THROUGH NO FAULT AFTER THE TIME OF AWARD" AND HOW DOES IT WORK?
  • Accessing The Hub
  • AFA Local Numbers

WHAT IS "ILLEGAL THROUGH NO FAULT AFTER THE TIME OF AWARD" AND HOW DOES IT WORK?

Very simply, "Illegal Through No Fault After The Time Of Award" occurs when a Flight is flying a trip and for some reason, rest requirement legalities or flight time legalities, cause the Flight Attendant to become illegal to originate their next pairing.

The following Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) language (Section 9.G.3-page 9-21) is very clear with regard to the point at which a Flight Attendant splits on to a trip the Flight Attendant was illegal to originate through no fault of his/her own.

3. Illegal Through No Fault After The Time of Award

a. If, after the time of award, a flight attendant becomes illegal through no fault of his/her own to originate his/her pairing, such flight attendant shall have the option of splitting on to the pairing, once he/she becomes legal, at the point the pairing passes through his/her domicile. If the pairing does not pass through the flight attendant's domicile, he/she will be permitted to pick up the pairing at the point where he/she becomes legal.

(1) For pairings other than such flight attendant's last trip of the bid month, such flight attendant shall be paid and credited for any portion(s) of the pairing flown by a substitute crew, up to the point where he/she splits back on or could have split back on.

(a) As an exception to this paragraph, a reserve awarded a pairing via the ETB on non-inviolable (OFF) days and subsequently awarded/assigned a pairing by Crew Scheduling on AVL days prior to such ETB trip will not be afforded pay protection.

(2) If such pairing was the flight attendant's last trip of the bid month, he/she shall be paid and credited in accordance with Paragraph G.5. below. (paid and credited for the entire pairing)


Despite the clear language of the contract, the Company was consistently forcing a Flight Attendant who was illegal to originate a pairing to deadhead and split back on to the pairing at the moment he/she became legal regardless of whether or not the pairing passed through the Flight Attendant's domicile at a later time. The language means a Flight Attendant will be required to deadhead to split back on the pairing only if the pairing does not pass through the Flight Attendant's domicile.

The Company disputed the clear language and intent of the above contractual provision. The Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) filed a grievance under the terms of the CBA to resolve the dispute. The Company denied the grievance based on past practice. The above contract language was added to the CBA in 2000 and the Company was citing pre-2000 past practice as the basis for their argument. AFA submitted the case for arbitration and a hearing was scheduled for September 17.

Prior to the arbitration date the Company agreed to settle the dispute in the Union's favor by adhering to the existing contract language and not reverting to past practice. The final details were worked out and agreed to last week.

Below are three examples that demonstrate how Illegal Through No Fault language is applied with respect to where, when and if a Lineholder Flight Attendant splits back onto a trip the Flight Attendant was illegal to originate. Reserve Flight Attendant requirements will be discussed following the examples.

(Note- Flight numbers and times have been omitted from all examples because they are irrelevant)


# 1 - A Flight Attendant is illegal to originate three-day pairing #90001 due to rest requirement legalities and the trip passes through the Flight Attendant's domicile at a later time when the Flight Attendant is legal to complete the trip.

Pairing # 90001

Day 1 0900 PHL-CLT-SAN (RON)
Day 2 0900 SAN-PHL-BUF (RON)
Day 3 0900 BUF-CLT-PHL

(Flight Attendant becomes legal at 1000 on Day 1)

Application of the CBA language:

Since pairing #90001 passes through the domicile on Day 2, the Lineholder Flight Attendant who was illegal to originate the pairing on Day 1 has the option to split back on the pairing in PHL on Day 2 and complete pairing. A Flight Attendant who chooses to split back on the pairing will be pay protected for the portion of the trip flown by another Flight Attendant and paid for the remainder of the trip.

A Flight Attendant who chooses not to split back on the pairing is only pay protected up to the point he/she was legal to split back on the trip in their domicile and is required to make up the difference in time in order to meet his/her obligation.

# 2 - A Flight Attendant is illegal to originate three-day pairing #9002 due to rest requirement legalities and the pairing does not pass through the Flight Attendant's domicile during the remainder of the pairing.

Pairing #90002

Day 1 0900 CLT-MIA-PHL-BUF (RON)
Day 2 0900 BUF-PHL-BUF (RON)
Day 3 0900 BUF-PHL-CLT

(Flight Attendant becomes legal at 1000 on Day 1)

Application of the CBA language:

Since pairing #90002 does not pass through the Flight Attendant's domicile at any time during the pairing, the Flight Attendant has the option to split back on the pairing at the first point the Flight Attendant is legal to do so. In this example, the Flight Attendant will have completed a legal rest break at 1000. A flight from CLT to PHL that will arrive in time for the Flight Attendant to split back on the pairing in PHL exists. If the Flight Attendant chooses to split back on the pairing he/she will deadhead to PHL and complete the split onto the pairing. The Flight Attendant will be pay protected for the CLT-MIA-PHL portion of the pairing and paid for the remainder of the pairing.

If the Flight Attendant chooses not to split back on the pairing, he/she will only be pay protected for the CLT-MIA-PHL portion of the pairing and will be responsible for making up the difference in time in order to meet his/her obligation.

#3 - A Flight Attendant is illegal to originate two-day pairing #90003 due to rest requirement legalities and the trip does not pass through the Flight Attendant's domicile.

Paring # 90003

Day 1 0900 PHL-LAX (RON)
Day 2 1200 LAX-PHL

(Flight Attendant becomes legal at 1000 on Day 1)

Application of the CBA language:

This pairing strikes at the heart of the intent of the CBA language. Like example #1 the Flight Attendant becomes legal at 1000 on Day 1. Conceivably in both example #1 and example #3, the Flight Attendant, after becoming legal on Day 1, could deadhead on Day 1 to split back on the pairing and legally complete the pairing. This is exactly what scheduling was requiring Flight Attendants to do and was the main point of the AFA dispute.

The language was written and agreed to in order to minimize deadheads and additional hotel rooms and still pay protect the Flight Attendants who were illegal to originate a pairing through no fault.

In example #1 and #3 it is impractical for Flight Attendants to be "cross-deadheading" around the system and also impractical to book additional hotel rooms.

Therefore, in example #3, the Flight Attendant does not have to split back on the trip since it does not ever pass through the Flight Attendant's domicile and is pay protected for the entire trip.

Reserves and Illegal Through No Fault After The Time of Award -

A Reserve is processed in two different categories based on whether or not a Reserve is illegal through no fault on an AVL day or on an off day.

AVL DAY

If a Reserve is illegal through no fault to originate a pairing on an AVL day the Reserve is removed from the trip and returned to AVL status.

A Reserve who is illegal to originate a pairing because he/she is illegal through no fault on an AVL is pay protected in the following manner:

Trip Passes Through Domicile:

A Reserve is pay protected for the portion up to where the trip passes through the domicile and legal or, if assigned another trip, the greater of the two.

Trip Does Not Pass Through Domicile:

A Reserve is pay protected for portion up to where the trip could have been split and legal or, if assigned another trip, the greater of the two. If the trip is unable to be split, as in example #3 above, a Reserve is paid the greater of the value of the trip or actual trip flown.

Off DAY

If a Reserve is illegal to originate a trip because he/she is illegal through no fault on an OFF or INV day the Reserve is split back on the trip in the same manner as a Lineholder.

The CBA does not provide for pay protection if a Reserve is illegal to originate a trip on an OFF day but does provide for pay protection on an INV day. CBA Section 9.G.3.a (1) (a) is cited below:

(a) As an exception to this paragraph, a reserve awarded a pairing via the ETB on non-inviolable (OFF) days and subsequently awarded/assigned a pairing by Crew Scheduling on AVL days prior to such ETB trip will not be afforded pay protection.


In conclusion, the Company has agreed to the Union's position regarding where and when a Flight Attendant splits back onto a pairing he/she was illegal to originate trough no fault. Crew Schedulers have been briefed and the proper procedure. If you are asked to split onto a trip outside of the CBA language, ask to speak to a Crew Scheduling Supervisor and call your local Union office.


Thank you,

Mike Flores, President
The US Airways Master Executive Council
AFA-CWA

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AFA US Airways Website

www.afausairways.org


Accessing The Hub:

http://thehub.usairways.com 
Logging in the first time your user name is u0(zero) and your five digit employee number. Your initial password is the first five digits of your social security number. Questions about the Hub? Please contact the EDS Help Desk at 336-744-6000 for assistance. More information can also be found HERE.

AFA Local Numbers
 

Council 41 DCA 703-212-8090
Council 69 BOS 781-289-8454
Council 70 PHL 215-492-0840
Council 82 LGA 315-736-3483
Council 89 CLT 704-527-0325

New Hotline Number Toll Free: 866-USA-AFA2
US AIRWAYS Benefits Information 800-872-4780

Reply to Inflight: askinflight@usairways.com


Got Questions? Get Answers

The *E-Line* is now in a new and improved format. By updating your profile at unionvoice.org you will be able to enjoy improved services in the near future! Visit your subscription management page at: http://www.unionvoice.org/

Got questions about This *E-Line* from AFA - US Airways or any other Union matter? Do NOT REPLY to the *E-Line*. PLEASE contact your local AFA officers or committee chairs directly: http://www.afausairways.org/emailaddresses2.htm

Your MEC Officers
Association of Flight Attendants
Hotline & *E-Line* - US Airways


Get all the latest from the Website http://www.afausairways.org
Call the Hotline  866-USA-AFA2
Encourage your friends to subscribe and receive their own *E-Line* from AFA - US Airways


If you would like to unsubscribe from E-Line at AFA-US Airways, you can visit your subscription management page at: http://www.unionvoice.org/

Click on the link below for more information from your union, online activism and benefits. http://www.unionvoice.org/wfn/join.html